Asked by: Agency partner
Do more blog posts actually help, or are we just making pages?
For an established site with hundreds of pages, adding hundreds more usually does very little. Volume stopped being the lever a while ago.
Programmatic pages worked when the index was thinner. Now a service-area page that differs from the last one by a town name is a page Google has seen ten thousand times, and the cost of publishing it isn't zero — it dilutes your internal linking, splits intent across near-duplicates and adds crawl overhead.
What to do instead, in order
- Fix the pages that already rank 4–15. They have demand and no further investment. This is the cheapest traffic in SEO and almost nobody does it first.
- Consolidate the near-duplicates you already published. Two pages at position 14 often become one at position 6.
- Then publish — but publish things only you can write. Real numbers, real process, something that happened to you.
The content that actually works now
The best-performing approach I've used lately isn't AI-generated volume at all: send the client FAQ-style questions, have their technicians and owners answer in their own words, and build the article around the real answers. It's slower. It's the only content that can't be copied.
And measure honestly — if pages are down on both month-over-month and year-over-year, that's decay. Down on one window only is usually seasonality, and rewriting a page because of weather is how months get wasted.
What we'd actually do
Follow-ups
So you won't sell me 100 blog posts?
I will, it's a real package, and I'll tell you first whether your site is in the situation where that helps. Usually a young site, rarely an established one.
How do I know if content is decaying?
Down on both month-over-month and year-over-year. One window only is seasonality.
Want this done on your site?
Tell me what's going on. You'll get a straight answer, including if that answer is that you don't need me.